Legal Opinion
Yoshioka v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 27, 1997No. B110759PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*978Opinion
WOODS, J.
Petitioner David Yoshioka wishes to collect noneconomic damages from real parties in interest Glenn Alan Todd and Judith Todd. He challenges Proposition 213 (passed by voters last November and which prohibits uninsured drivers from collecting such damages) as unconstitutional on due process and equal protection grounds. Amici curiae in support of petitioner further challenge under California’s single-subject rule. We find that the initiative withstands constitutional muster on all three grounds and therefore must deny his petition for a writ of mandate.
Factual and Procedural…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Horwich v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Progressive SEC. Ins. Co. v. FosterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
- Hodges v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Hermosa Beach Stop Oil Coalition v. City of Hermosa BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Quackenbush v. Superior Court of S.F.California Court of Appeal · 1997
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.