State v. Cates
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKonenkamp, Justice
[¶ 1.] Can a sex abuse perpetrator be convictéd of both rape and criminal pedophilia for multiple acts of sexual penetration committed in the same period? The defendant contends that because the acts occurred in the course of one evening, multiple punishments for these acts constitute double jeopardy. We conclude that because there were at least two acts of sexual penetration, the two convictions were proper. In addition, the' defendant appeals on several other grounds, including (1) the admission of hearsay evidence under SDCL 19-16-38; (2) the denial of a motion for a psychiatric exam of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- White v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- State v. LogueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. FloodySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. OlsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad v. AcuitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. McKinneySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. GuthmillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. BallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Heib v. LehrkampSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.