Legal Opinion

State v. Floody

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1992No. 17366PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WUEST, Justice.

This is a criminal case which was tried before a jury. The jury found defendant Floody (Floody) guilty of two counts of rape in violation of SDCL 22-22-1(4). The trial court entered Judgment of Conviction from which Floody appeals. We affirm.

FACTS

In November 1989, P.C. (Pennie) married W.C. (William). At the time of their marriage, Pennie had a four-year-old son named Kenneth; and William had two children, A.C. age six, and Randy age four. William and Pennie purchased and moved into a home in Lawrence County, South Dakota. The residence had three bedrooms on the main floor and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. State v. MiddletonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. MyersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Stevens v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. RhinesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. GoodroadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. BarnettTennessee Supreme Court · 1995

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API