Legal Opinion

Jacks v. City of Santa Barbara

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 26, 2015No. B253474Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 2/26/15 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX ROLLAND JACKS et al., 2d Civil No. B253474 (Super. Ct. No. 1383959) Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Santa Barbara County) v. CITY OF SANTA BARBARA, Defendant and Respondent. Appellants are an individual and a hotel who incurred a one percent surcharge on their electricity bills (1% surcharge) collected by Southern California Edison (SCE) and remitted to respondent City of Santa Barbara (City). The City did not seek voter approval of the 1% surcharge. SCE collects it…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of Falcone & FykeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Silicon Valley Taxpayers' Ass'n v. Santa Clara County Open Space AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Sinclair Paint Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Bighorn-Desert View Water Agency v. VerjilCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Evans v. CENTERSTONE DEVELOPMENT CO.California Court of Appeal · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API