Turney v. Pott
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAn Cell Otti, J.
This is an appeal from the decree of final distribution in the matter of the estate of Henry Lux, deceased. The sole appellant is one V. W. Turney, who claimed, as the successor of Charles IT. Lux, a son of deceased, that an undivided one-sixth of a lot in the city of San Jose should be distributed to her. Her claim is based on the fact that prior to the death of deceased one Clayton had recovered a judgment against said Charles H. Lux for $493.75; that after such death an execution was issued on said judgment, whereunder the interest of Charles H. Lux in said lot was sold to her, and a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re the Estate of FairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Estate of FairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- In Re Estate of AngleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by7 opinions
- Church Home for Children of Protestant Episcopal Church v. LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- In Re Estate of HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Fairclaw v. ForrestCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Noble v. BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Estate of GregoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.