Legal Opinion

South San Bernardino Land & Improvement Co. v. San Bernardino National Bank

California Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1899No. L.A. No. 500PublishedCited by 23 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County and from an order denying a new trial. John L. Campbell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, C.

This is an action to enforce a trust and compel a conveyance. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial.

1. The substance of the complaint is that one Rosenthal and seven others bought certain lots of the rancho of San Bernardino, said Rosenthal and five others paying each one-tenth, and the other two each paying two-tenths of the purchase price of said lots. That the eight persons were to have proportionate interests in the land purchased equal to the amount paid by each of them. That they subsequently received a deed to the lots, xvhich deed failed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bates v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. O'Connor v. IrvineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Murphy v. ClaytonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Von Drachenfels v. DoolittleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Case v. CoddingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Kronkright v. GardnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. In re the Estate of ParrottNevada Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Altramano v. SwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. County of Los Angeles v. HannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Breitenbucher v. OppenheimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API