Legal Opinion

County of Los Angeles v. Hannon

California Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1910No. L.A. No. 2497PublishedCited by 16 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.

This action was brought to quiet title to a tract of land in Los Angeles County. Plaintiff had judgment and defendants appeal therefrom and from an order denying their motion for a new trial.

All parties asserted title to the property from a common grantor, Andrew Glassell, the plaintiff claiming under a deed made by said Glassell and one Ralph Rogers to D. MeCool. This deed to MeCool described some property not involved in this action, but as the whole description must to some extent be examined in determining the meaning of the description of the particular property involved here, the entire…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stanley v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  2. McDonald v. McCoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Rogers v. Galloway Female CollegeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1898
  4. Tuffree v. PolhemusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Minter v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Jeffords v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Strong v. StrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Horton v. HortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Weniger v. RipleyOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  5. California Packing Corp. v. GroveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API