Legal Opinion

Cates v. Eddy

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1983No. 83-9PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARDINE, Justice.

This was a malicious prosecution action resulting from the arrest of plaintiff, Bruce Eddy (appellee), upon a criminal complaint and warrant issued because of alleged conduct of defendant, Earl Cates (appellant). Appeal is from the judgment in that action awarding both compensatory and punitive damages.

We affirm the reduced judgment if re-mittitur is accepted; or, if it is not, we remand for a new trial on the issue of damages.

The issues upon appeal, as stated by appellant, are:

“A. Did the Trial Court err in allowing the jury to return a verdict with excessive damages?
“B.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Rissler & McMurry Co. v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Town of Jackson v. ShawWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Christine M. Grunewald, Individually and as of the Will of Henry W. Grunewald, Deceased v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, a Missouri CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
  5. Campen v. StoneWyoming Supreme Court · 1981

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Gates v. RichardsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Sanders v. Daniel International Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  3. Leithead v. American Colloid Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. DonahueWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Benjamin v. Hooper Electronic Supply Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1990

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API