Legal Opinion

Director General of Railroads v. Kastenbaum

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 12, 1923No. 39PublishedCited by 104 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Taft

•Respondent brought an action in the Supreme Court of Erie County, New York, against the Director General of Railroads, seeking damages for false imprisonment and malicious prosecution. The trial court, at the close of the plaintiff’s case, dismissed the^cause of action for malicious prosecution, but allowed the trial to proceed to verdict and judgment for $500- for false imprisonment. The judgment was affirmed by the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court and a motion for leave to appeal was denied by the Court of Appeals of the State. .

The brief for petitioner on the merits states the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. AultSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Stewart v. SonnebornSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Philadelphia, Wilmington, & Baltimore Railroad v. QuigleySupreme Court of the United States · 1859
  4. Genga v. Director General of RailroadsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922

3Cited by104 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Walczyk v. RioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007

99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API