Legal Opinion
Englewood Terrace Ltd. Partnership v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 10, 2004No. 03-2209CPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WOLSKI, Judge.
Defendant has moved for a dismissal of this ease under Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims, arguing that this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. At issue is whether provisions of the Multifamily Assisted Housing Reform and Affordability Act of 1997 (“MAHRA”), which preclude judicial review of certain decisions by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”), insulate defendant from claims for breach of a contract entered into under MAHRA. The Court concludes that they do not.
*584BACKGROUND
When ruling…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- MORI Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- CBY Design Builders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Chisolm v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Contreras v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.