Legal Opinion
Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 6, 2014No. 1:13-cv-00236PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Dismissal for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, RCFC 12(b)(1); contract closeout; contract administration; no bid protest jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b); Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. §§ 7101-7109; standing; no competitive injury alleged.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WOLSKI, Judge.
This case has been brought in the guise of a pre-award bid protest. Plaintiff, Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. (KBR), challenges what it claims to be a solicitation for a proposal to conduct closeout activities for KBR’s contract DAAA09-02-D-0007, more commonly known as the LOGCAP III contract (LOGCAP…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- National Air Cargo Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Itility, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Res Rei Development, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Coast Professional, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Transatlantic Lines LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.