Legal Opinion

Wolf v. Akin

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 27, 1914No. 8,236PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From Sullivan Circuit Court; William H. Bridwell, Judge. Action by Charles T. Akin against Mayme Wolf. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHottel, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment recovered by appellee on a note executed to him by appellant and Andy Fisher. . There was a trial by jury resulting in a verdict for appellee in the sum of $140.

*5901. *589Appellant, in his brief, states that the sole issue in the case was whether appellant executed the note as principal or surety and, that the only error assigned in this court *590is the overruling of appellant’s motion for a new trial. On this statement in such brief, we are asked by appellee to dismiss the appeal on the ground that neither said motion for a new trial nor its substance is set out in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Garn v. Board of Election CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Conner v. Andrews Land, Home & Improvement Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Welch v. State, ex rel. BeauchampIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. GrebIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  5. Chandler Coal Co. v. SamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Moore v. OhlIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. HoffmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Vandalia Coal Co. v. ButlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. Miller v. HaneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Town of Clarksville v. Ohio Falls Hydraulic Manufacturing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API