Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Greb
Indiana Court of Appeals
Prom Lake Circuit Court; Willis G. McMahan, Judge.. Action by Carl Greb against tbe Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.
The appellee’s amended complaint consisted of two paragraphs, and the appellant’s answer was the general denial. Upon trial by jury only the issue formed upon the first paragraph of complaint was submitted for decision. The action of the court in overruling the appellant’s demurrer to that paragraph for .want of sufficient facts is presented for review.
It was shown by’ the first paragraph of the amended complaint that the appellee was, and for more than six years had been, continuously, the owner in fee simple and in the exclusive possession and occupancy of certain land, described, in the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. Hamlet Hay Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. CluggishIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Collins v. CollinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. CarvenerIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Board of Commissioners v. WagnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Chicago & Erie Railroad v. LuddingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
- Moore v. OhlIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Evansville, Mount Carmel & Northern Railway Co. v. ScottIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
- Graham v. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1906
- Lay v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.