Legal Opinion

Town of Clarksville v. Ohio Falls Hydraulic Manufacturing Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 30, 1914No. 8,804PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From Clark Circuit Court; Harry O. Montgomery, Judge. Action by the Town of Clarksville against The Ohio Falls Hydraulic Manufacturing Company and others. From, a judgment for defendants, the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFelt, J.

Appellant filed an amended complaint in five paragraphs against appellees, in each of which facts were alleged to show that appellant was the owner, or entitled to the use and control of certain lands, lying between the town of Clarksville, Indiana, and the Ohio River, which lands were a part of what was known as the “Clarksville slip”. Each paragraph was answered by general denial and by five paragraphs of affirmative answer, which included pleas of former adjudication, as to each paragraph and the statute of limitations. A demurrer for want of facts was overruled to each paragraph of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jarrell v. BrubakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Richardson v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Johnson v. Knudson-Mercer Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1906
  4. State ex rel. Braden v. KrugIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Wilson v. BuellIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Adams v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  2. Bereolos v. RothIndiana Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Chicago, Terre Haute & Southeastern Railway Co. v. CollinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API