Legal Opinion

Stutsman v. Williams

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 12, 1922No. 10725PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This was an action commenced in the district court for the purpose of setting aside the judgment of a court of record upon the ground of fraud.

The court below sustained a general demurrer to plaintiffs’ third amended petition, an i it is to reverse this action that this proceeding in error was commenced.

The judgment assailed in this action was rendered 'in an action' upon a promissory no-;e and to foreclose a mortgage given to secure the payment thereof, commenced by Chas. E. Williams, one of the defendants in this action, against Eva M. Stutsman, one of the plaintiffs herein. On the face of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ely Walker Dry Goods Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Reynolds v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dockery v. Central Arizona Light & Power Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Sadberry v. HopeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  3. American Bank & Trust Co. v. FrensleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Storm v. GarnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Davison v. Mutual Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API