Legal Opinion
Regents of University of California v. Public Employment Relations Board
California Supreme Court
Decided April 3, 1986No. S.F. 24803PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BIRD, C. J.
The Regents of the University of California (University) petitions for review of a decision by the Public Employment Relations Board (PERB or the Board). The Board found that housestaif, 1 who are paid by the University while participating in residency programs at clinics, institutes or hospitals owned or operated by the University, are “employees” within the meaning of Government Code section 3562, subdivision (f) 2 of the Higher Education Employer-Employee Relations Act (HEERA or the Act) (§ 3560 et seq.). Therefore, they are entitled to collective bargaining rights. This…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Leedom v. KyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Ford Motor Co. (Chicago Stamping Plant) v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Walker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Gupta v. New Britain General HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Boling v. Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- Long Beach Police Officers Assn. v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Western Growers Insurance v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.