California Portland Cement Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
California Supreme Court
1Concurrence
Concurring and Supplementing Opinion, in Accordance With the Directions in Section 53 of the Code of Civil Procedure*
McCOMB, J.
I concur in the judgment of this court which annuls the orders of the commission, for the following reasons:
Petitioner filed a complaint against the Union Pacific Railroad Company (hereinafter called “Union Pacific”), a common carrier railroad. It alleged that Union Pacific’s rates for iron ore from Dunn to Kaiser, a distance of 130 miles, were less than the rates from Basin to Colton, a distance of 131 miles, and were therefore discriminatory.
Petitioner alleged that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Falk v. FalkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Mark Hopkins, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- McKay v. GesfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Market Street Railway Co. v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- California Adj. Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry.California Supreme Court · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.