Legal Opinion · Concurrence

California Portland Cement Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1957No. S. F. 19495Published

1Concurrence

Concurring and Supplementing Opinion, in Accordance With the Directions in Section 53 of the Code of Civil Procedure*

McCOMB, J.

I concur in the judgment of this court which annuls the orders of the commission, for the following reasons:

Petitioner filed a complaint against the Union Pacific Railroad Company (hereinafter called “Union Pacific”), a common carrier railroad. It alleged that Union Pacific’s rates for iron ore from Dunn to Kaiser, a distance of 130 miles, were less than the rates from Basin to Colton, a distance of 131 miles, and were therefore discriminatory.

Petitioner alleged that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Falk v. FalkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. Mark Hopkins, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. McKay v. GesfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Market Street Railway Co. v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. California Adj. Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry.California Supreme Court · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API