Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Watson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 28, 1993PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 15, 1991, which ruled that claimant was entitled to receive unemployment insurance benefits.
It is not disputed that by formal rule the employer required its paralegals to keep daily time sheets and to separate "billable” from "nonbillable” hours. Claimant acknowledged this policy and admitted that he may have allocated times to certain projects when in fact he was doing other assignments for his supervisor. He contended, however, that he and many of the other paralegals did not complete their time sheets on a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re McHughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- In re the Claim of LeuciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- In re the Claim of FigueroaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- In re the Claim of LackeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- In re the Claim of MazzellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hider v. Department of Labor, Licensing & RegulationCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- In re the Claim of HookAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- In re Claim of WaldenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- In re the Claim of BeerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- In re the Claim of JacobAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.