Legal Opinion
Bond v. Village of Canal Winchester, 07ap-556 (3-6-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 6, 2008No. 07AP-556PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Jeffrey L. Bond, appeals from: (1) a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas dismissing his action against defendant-appellee, the Village of Canal Winchester ("Village"), and (2) a judgment awarding the Village attorney fees. For the following reasons, we affirm the judgment dismissing Bond's action, but reverse the judgment awarding attorney fees.
{¶ 2} The instant action revolves around Bond's assertion that the Village illegally prevented a referendum on Village Ordinance No. 91-05, which rezoned 7.5 acres located within the Village from "Low…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Perrysburg Township v. City of RossfordOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Cincinnati v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- Desenco, Inc. v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Transamerica Insurance v. NolanOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Maitland v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. RyanOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- James v. My Cute Car, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Lane v. U.S. Bank N.A.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
- Foreman v. Lucas County Court of Common PleasOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Gianetti v. Teakwood, Ltd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.