Perrysburg Township v. City of Rossford
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.
{¶ 1} The issue in this case is whether an instrument providing an unconditional promise to pay a specified sum of money on a date certain can be a “security” pursuant to R.C. 1707.01(B). To determine whether a particular promissory note is a security, we adopt the test set forth in Reves v. Ernst & Young (1990), 494 U.S. 56, 66-67, 110 S.Ct. 945, 108 L.Ed.2d 47. Applying this test to the facts stated in Perrysburg Township’s complaint, we conclude that Perrysburg Township may be able to prove that the note in this case is a security, and, therefore, we affirm the judgment of the court of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. C. M. Joiner Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,614 the Exchange National Bank of Chicago v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by363 opinions
- Morrow v. Reminger & Reminger Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation v. McKinleyOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- State ex rel. Ohio Civ. Serv. Emps. Assn. v. State (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- Rayess v. Educational Commission for Foreign Medical GraduatesOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P. v. KolenichOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
358 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.