Legal Opinion
White v. Starbucks Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 2, 2007No. C 06-3861 VRWPublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WALKER, Chief Judge.
This action is brought by Steve White, a former store manager of defendant Starbucks Corp (Starbucks), who purports to represent a class consisting of individuals who work or worked as managers in Starbucks’ California stores. No class has been certified. Starbucks moves for summary judgment on all claims. For reasons discussed below, Starbucks’ motion is GRANTED.
I
The following facts are undisputed. On May 3, 2004, Starbucks hired White as a store manager, and White entered the Starbucks Retail Management Training (RMT) program. Doc # 43, Ex A at 16:1— 14, Ex B at…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Thornhill Publishing Company, Inc. v. General Telephone & Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Jaimez v. Daiohs USA, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Alonzo v. Maximus, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
- Brown v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2008
- Arredondo v. Delano Farms Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2014
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.