Legal Opinion

Imperial Farming Co. v. Van Horn

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 18, 1930No. Docket Nos. 425, 426PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMES, J., pro tem.

These appeals were taken from judgments entered in favor of the defendants. It was stipulated by counsel that they are companion cases and involve substantially the same situation and are governed by the same legal and equitable principles and that the decision of this court in the case of Imperial Farming Co. et al. v. Van Horn, No. 425, shall apply to and govern its companion case. In the ensuing opinion we shall refer to the .facts in that case without reference to its companion ease.

The action was brought for the purpose of quieting plaintiff’s title and right of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Page v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Churchill v. AckermanWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Ward v. ShermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Johnston v. FishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Huerstal v. MuirCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Olson v. CornwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. Pacific Coast Joint Stock Land Bank v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Fremont Indemnity Co. v. Du AlbaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API