Legal Opinion

Cambridge Lodge, No. 9, Knights of Pythias v. Routh

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1904No. 20,318PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Henry Circuit Court; W. O. Barnard, Special Judge. Action by Cambridge Lodge, Ho. 9, Knights of Pythias against Charles W. Routh. • From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Transferred from Appellate Court under §1337u Burns 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtJordan, C. J.

This action was tried and determined in the lower court adversely.to appellant on its complaint, consisting of three paragraphs, the first of which is the landlord’s statutory action for recovery of the possession of the premises in controversy. It is therein alleged that on the 1st day of May, 1899, and long prior thereto, the plaintiff, Cambridge Lodge, Ho. 9, Knights of Pythias, was, and now is, the owner in fee simple and in possession of the following described real estate, situated in Wayne county, Indiana, viz., lots numbered sixteen, seventeen, and eighteen in block three, west of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Richwine v. Presbyterian ChurchIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Wilson v. BrookshireIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Butler University v. ConardIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Noe v. RollIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Bradford v. School Town of MarionIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kahle v. Crown Oil Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Rink v. LowryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. Garrick v. GarrickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. Henry v. FrazierIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. Frankel v. VossIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API