Legal Opinion

Weil v. Connecticut Fire Insurance

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 27, 1923No. 11,505PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcMahan, J.

Complaint by appellants on a contract of fire insurance covering a stock of wool owned by appellants and located at New Market, Ohio.

Appellee answered in nine paragraphs. Appellants’ demurrer for want of facts being overruled as to each paragraph except the first, and they refusing to plead further, judgment was rendered in favor of appellee. The errors assigned relate to the action of the court in *423overruling the demurrer to the several paragraphs of answer.

The complaint alleged that appellants were the owners of a stock of wool in the State of Ohio, the execution of the insurance policy May…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hayward v. HaywardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Ohio Farmers Insurance v. WilliamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Buckel v. AuerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. Keys v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  5. State ex rel. May v. HallIndiana Supreme Court · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ballard v. Drake's EstateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Edelman v. EdelmanWyoming Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Weil v. Allemannia Fire InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Weil v. American InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API