Legal Opinion

State v. Fisher

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 17, 1990No. DA 391161-8903; CA A61046PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

In a trial to the court, defendant was found guilty of unlawful possession of a firearm, ORS 166.250, and of carrying a loaded firearm within the city. Portland City Code § 14.32.010. The convictions were merged for all purposes, resulting in a judgment of conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm only. On appeal, defendant assigns error only to the trial court’s denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal, contending that the court erroneously interpreted ORS 166.250.

Given the limited question presented on appeal, a detailed statement of facts is not necessary. Suffice it to say…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. State v. AbramCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. State v. LeakeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  4. State v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. State v. LeakeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API