Legal Opinion

DeBruin v. Green County

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1976No. 106 (1974)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.

The sole issue presented on this appeal is as follows: In determining the value after condemnation of a parcel which has been diminished by a partial taking through eminent domain proceedings, may the temporary inconvenience caused by public improvements work be a factor on such value?

In Wis J I — Civil, Part II, 8125, the following rule is stated:

“Damages resulting from the inconvenience occasioned by the construction work does not constitute a compen-sable item in the sense that you will separately find that damage, but it is an item to be taken into consideration by you in determining the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Just v. Marinette CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Carazalla v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Luber v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Stefan Auto Body v. State Highway CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Eggebeen v. SonnenburgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Zinn v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  2. 118th Street Kenosha, LLC v. Wisconsin Department of TransportationWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Kallembach v. StateCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
  4. 118th Street Kenosha, LLC v. Wisconsin Department of TransportationWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Zinn v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API