Legal Opinion
DeBruin v. Green County
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided May 4, 1976No. 106 (1974)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.
The sole issue presented on this appeal is as follows: In determining the value after condemnation of a parcel which has been diminished by a partial taking through eminent domain proceedings, may the temporary inconvenience caused by public improvements work be a factor on such value?
In Wis J I — Civil, Part II, 8125, the following rule is stated:
“Damages resulting from the inconvenience occasioned by the construction work does not constitute a compen-sable item in the sense that you will separately find that damage, but it is an item to be taken into consideration by you in determining the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Just v. Marinette CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Carazalla v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Luber v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Stefan Auto Body v. State Highway CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Eggebeen v. SonnenburgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Zinn v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- 118th Street Kenosha, LLC v. Wisconsin Department of TransportationWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
- Kallembach v. StateCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
- 118th Street Kenosha, LLC v. Wisconsin Department of TransportationWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
- Zinn v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983