Eggebeen v. Sonnenburg
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
Zoning by municipalities is allowed under sec. 62.23 (5), Stats., now numbered sec. 62.23 (7), and sec. 62.23 (5) (a), Stats. 1939, provides that “such regulation is declared to be for public health, safety and welfare.” That section also permits the amendment of zoning ordinances. The main question presented is whether the amendment adopted by the common council is justified as being in the interests of public health, safety, or welfare. The facts of this case were apparently considered by the members of the planning commission and the common council to show that the restriction by which the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Arverne Bay Construction Co. v. ThatcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- State ex rel. Carter v. HarperWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- State ex rel. Tingley v. GurdaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Matter of Eaton v. SweenyNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Rosenberg v. Village of Whitefish BayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Wakefield v. KraftCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Keller v. City of Council Bluffs, IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
- Buhler v. Racine CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Page Et Ux. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1945
- Shalvey v. Zoning Board of WarwickSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1965
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.