Legal Opinion

Gen. Accident Assurance Corp. v. Indus. Accident Comm'n

California Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1921No. S. F. No. 9633PublishedCited by 13 opinions

PROCEEDINGS on Certiorari to review an award of the Industrial Accident Commission. Award affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShurtleff, J.

Certiorari to review an award of the Industrial Accident Commission granting compensation to Samuel Shrout, an employee of one Fred Barr, who, with the General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corporation, are the petitioners, hereinafter called the defendants.

The following is a brief statement of the facts:

The petitioner, Shrout, was employed as an automobile tire-repairer by Barr in the latter's garage in San Francisco. During the noon hour of the day upon which Shrout was injured two men, strangers to Barr as well as Shrout, drove their automobile.into Barr’s garage and asked him to serve…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Western Metal Supply Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Archibald v. Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Coronado Beach Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. State ex rel. Duluth Brewing & Malting Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Larson v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Frigidaire Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Great Western Power Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API