Legal Opinion

Treese v. City of Delaware

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 21, 1994No. 93API10-1433PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Whiteside, Presiding Judge.

Defendant/third-party plaintiff-appellant, city of Delaware, appeals from a judgment of the Ohio Court of Claims and raises the following three assignments of error:

“1. The Court of Claims erred in finding that since the guardrail in question was built before the passage of the Court of Claims Act, the court had no jurisdiction.”
“2. The Court of Claims erred in finding that the Ohio Department of Transportation was immune from liability for failing to upgrade the guardrail system at the 42/23 overpass.”
“3. The Court of Claims erred in sustaining the summary judgment…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Velotta v. Leo Petronzio Landscaping, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Sedar v. Knowlton Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Winwood v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Lunar v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Court of Appeals · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Durrani (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Coleman v. Portage County EngineerOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Murray v. ChillicotheOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Mercer v. KeaneOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. Davis v. Mercy St. Vincent Med. Ctr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API