Murray v. Chillicothe
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Harsha, Judge.
{¶ 1} After he fell through a sewer grate located in the right-of-way for a city street, Michael Murray sued the landowner and the city of Chillicothe to recover for his injuries. When the court granted summary judgment to the city of Chillicothe on the basis that it is immune from liability, Murray appealed. Initially, Murray argues that the court erred in finding that this case involves the design of a storm-sewer system, which is a governmental function. He contends that his injury resulted from the city’s failure to maintain the sewer, which is a proprietary function.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Mitseff v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Bostic v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Essman v. PortsmouthOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Coleman v. Portage County EngineerOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- Jackson v. Pike Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Williams v. GlousterOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Alcus v. Bainbridge Twp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.