Legal Opinion

People v. Barker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 12, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a guilty plea of robbery in the third degree (Penal Law § 160.05). The record establishes that defendant’s waiver of the right to appeal was voluntary, knowing and intelligent (see, People v DeJesus, 248 AD2d 1023, lv denied 92 NY2d 879; People v Zimmerman, 219 AD2d 848, lv denied 88 NY2d 856). “Because Supreme Court did not advise defendant of the potential periods of incarceration, the waiver by defendant of the right to appeal does not encompass his challenge to the severity of the sentence”…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. DeJesusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. People v. VargasNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. People v. SheaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. People v. WynnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. People v. ZimmermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. MayhamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. People v. CopelandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API