Legal Opinion

People v. Mayham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 10, 2000PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting her upon her plea of guilty of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05 [2]), defendant’s sole contention on appeal is that the sentence is unduly harsh or severe. Contrary to the People’s contention, defendant’s waiver of the right to appeal does not encompass the challenge to the severity of the sentence because defendant was not advised of the potential periods of incarceration (see, People v Cormack, 269 AD2d 815; People v Barker, 266 AD2d 846; People v Wynn, 262 AD2d 1052). We conclude, however, that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. WynnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. People v. CormackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. People v. BarkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. OehlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. People v. SeymourAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API