People v. Mayham
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting her upon her plea of guilty of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05 [2]), defendant’s sole contention on appeal is that the sentence is unduly harsh or severe. Contrary to the People’s contention, defendant’s waiver of the right to appeal does not encompass the challenge to the severity of the sentence because defendant was not advised of the potential periods of incarceration (see, People v Cormack, 269 AD2d 815; People v Barker, 266 AD2d 846; People v Wynn, 262 AD2d 1052). We conclude, however, that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. WynnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. CormackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. BarkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. OehlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. SeymourAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001