Legal Opinion

People v. Copeland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 9, 2001PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The waiver by defendant of the right to appeal does not encompass her contention that County Court erred in imposing an enhanced sentence based upon her postplea conduct (see, People v Hicks, 288 AD2d 882 [decided herewith]; People v Parker, 271 AD2d 63, 68, Iv denied 95 NY2d 967). Defendant, however, failed to object to the enhanced sentence or to seek to withdraw her plea or vacate *907the judgment of conviction. Thus, her challenge to the enhancement of her sentence is not preserved for our review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Perry, 252 AD2d 990,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. ParkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. People v. PerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. People v. HicksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. People v. BarkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. HolmesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API