People v. Copeland
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The waiver by defendant of the right to appeal does not encompass her contention that County Court erred in imposing an enhanced sentence based upon her postplea conduct (see, People v Hicks, 288 AD2d 882 [decided herewith]; People v Parker, 271 AD2d 63, 68, Iv denied 95 NY2d 967). Defendant, however, failed to object to the enhanced sentence or to seek to withdraw her plea or vacate *907the judgment of conviction. Thus, her challenge to the enhancement of her sentence is not preserved for our review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Perry, 252 AD2d 990,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. ParkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. PerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. HicksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. BarkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. HolmesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003