Legal Opinion

Bruner v. Cawthon

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided October 20, 1995No. 2940678PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

The Bruners appeal from a judgment based on a jury verdict in favor of Dr. Thomas H. Cawthon and his professional corporation [hereinafter, "Dr. Cawthon"], in an action alleging medical malpractice and the wrongful death of the Bruners' son. The Supreme Court transferred the cause to this court pursuant to Ala. Code 1975, § 12-2-7(6).

On appeal, the Bruners raise two issues relating to jury selection. First, they claim that the trial judge erred by denying their…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BrunerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  2. Looney v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  3. Sharrief v. GerlachSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  4. Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  5. State v. McKinneyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API