Legal Opinion

State v. McKinney

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 22, 1998No. CR-98-180PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The State of Alabama filed this petition for a writ of mandamus directed to t, he Honorable John D. Jolly, circuit judge for the Thirty-fourth Judicial Circuit. The State asks us to order Judge Jolly to reinstate the indictment against Janice McKinney. In November 1997, McKinney was indicted for bribing a witness, a violation of § 13A-10-121, Code of Alabama 1975, The indictment charging her with the offense incorrectly cited the Code section she was charged with violating as § 13A-11-121.1 After the jury was sworn and the attorney had made opening statements, McKinney moved to dismiss the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McDougall v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. Ex Parte BushSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. Ex Parte NiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  5. Hunt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MaddoxCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  2. Hampton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  3. Ex Parte SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  4. Green Tree Financial Corp. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API