Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Bruner

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 30, 1996No. 1950451PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

681 So.2d 173 (1996)

Ex parte Anne BRUNER and James Bruner, individually and as administratrix and administrator of the Estate of James Holland Bruner, deceased.

(Re Anne BRUNER and James Bruner, etc. v. Thomas H. CAWTHON, M.D., F.A.C.S., P.C., et al.).

1950451.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

August 30, 1996.

James H. Tipler of Tipler Law Firm, Andalusia, for petitioners.

Thomas H. Keene, Fred W. Tyson and N. Wayne Simms, Jr. of Rushton, Stakely, Johnston & Garrett, Montgomery, for respondent.

2Per curiam

The writ of certiorari is quashed as improvidently granted.

In quashing the writ, however, this Court disapproves…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Cook; Concurrence · Hooper.

3Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by26 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Kenneth L. LillySupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  2. May v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  3. Looney v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  4. Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  5. Pace v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API