Bean v. Colton
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtSlack, J.
The action is tort for the alleged conversion of certain live stock. Defendant pleaded in justification that, as constable of the town of Thetford, he attached the property in question in an action returnable to Orange county court, wherein one Walter Pieknell was plaintiff and this plaintiff was defendant, and on written application of Pieknell for that purpose sold such property in accordance with the provisions of G. L. 2063. Trial was by court, and, on tbe facts found, plaintiff had judgment and the case comes here on defendant’s exceptions.
At the close of plaintiff’s evidence defendant…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McAllister v. BenjaminSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
- Latremouille v. Bennington & Rutland Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1891
- Crampton v. Valido Marble Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1888
- Allen Lumber Co. v. HigueraSupreme Court of Vermont · 1913
- Walker v. WilmarthSupreme Court of Vermont · 1864
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Parizo v. WilsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
- State v. OrlandiSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934
- White River Chair Co. v. Connecticut River Power Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1932
- Dailey v. Town of LudlowSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
- Houghton v. GrimesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1930
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.