Legal Opinion

Allen Lumber Co. v. Higuera

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 14, 1913PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Trover for lumber. Plea, the general issue. Trial by court at the March Term, 1912, Washington County, Waterman, J., presiding. Judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant excepted. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

This is an action of trover. The case was heard by the court and on facts found judgment was rendered for the plaintiffs and a certified execution was awarded. The defendant excepted.

The Allen Lumber Company is a partnership engaged in the lumber business. In July, 1910, the defendant purchased of the plaintiffs some lumber. He asked for credit but that was denied on the ground that as he was a stranger to the plaintiffs the sale, if made, must be a cash transaction. The defendant told the partner with whom the business was done that if the latter would send the lumber to a place in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Saunders v. KohnkeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  2. Hammett v. . LinnemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. Crampton v. Valido Marble Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1888
  4. Tinker v. MorrillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1866
  5. Webster v. State Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1908

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bean v. ColtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  2. Wolcott v. MongeonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1914
  3. Eastman v. JacobsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  4. Luce v. BrownSupreme Court of Vermont · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API