Legal Opinion

State v. Orlandi

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 6, 1934PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoulton, J.

These respondents were tried together, and convicted, of a breach of the peace which consisted of an assault upon Sidney Eigg. Two others, Saldi and Ortiz, were placed upon trial at the same time, but a nolle prosequi was entered as to them, although the necessity for this procedure is not apparent.

An examination of the transcript discloses that the jury would have been justified in finding the following facts: Eigg was a granite cutter, employed in Barre. There was, at the time, a strike in progress, a fact of such notoriety that, even if it were not suggested by the record, judicial notice…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Morris v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  2. Gibson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  3. Woodhouse v. Woodhouse Et Ux.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  4. State v. WardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1888
  5. Brown v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. MorrillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1969
  2. State v. BaconSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  3. State v. DesoSupreme Court of Vermont · 1938
  4. State v. BarrSupreme Court of Vermont · 1966
  5. State v. BissonetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API