Legal Opinion

Thomas Sand Co. v. Colonial Pipeline Co.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided February 25, 2002No. 3454PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STILWELL, Judge:

Thomas Sand sued Colonial for damages, alleging a spill from its pipeline rupture contaminated a sand deposit Thomas Sand had leased on the Reedy River. The trial court held the failure to exhaust administrative avenues to obtain a permit was the proximate cause of its inability to mine the sand and granted Colonial summary judgment. We reverse.

FACTS

Colonial owns and operates a 36 inch pipeline extending from Houston to New York which transports petroleum products. In late June 1996, Colonial’s pipeline ruptured at its junction with the Reedy River in Greenville County,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Baughman v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. Tupper v. Dorchester CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  3. Bishop v. South Carolina Department of Mental HealthSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  4. State v. SchumpertSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  5. Young Ex Rel. Estate of Young v. Tide Craft, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1978

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mellen v. LaneCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  2. Capital City Insurance v. BP Staff, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
  3. State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  4. Fields Ex Rel. Fields v. Regional Medical Center OrangeburgCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  5. McMillan v. South Carolina Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API