Legal Opinion
McMillan v. South Carolina Department of Agriculture
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided March 14, 2005No. 3963PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEATTY, J.:
The South Carolina Department of Agriculture (SCDA) appeals the decision of the special referee finding Johnny McMillan and Jimmie Griner (collectively Respondents) were entitled to recover damages, pre-judgment interest, and attorney’s fees from the Warehouse Receipts Guaranty Fund. 1 We affirm in part, and reverse in part.
FACTS
McMillan and Griner are farmers in Hampton County. Each contracted with Hampton County Warehouse (the warehouse) to store cotton. The warehouse was a licensed facility by the SCDA pursuant to sections 39-22-10 through — 200 of the South Carolina Code…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Wilder Corp. v. WilkeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Hitachi Data Systems Corp. v. LeathermanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- Sloan v. Greenville CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
- Brown v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Layman v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- South Carolina Coastal Conservation League v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- Dixie Bell, Inc. v. ReddCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
- McMillan v. South Carolina Department of AgricultureSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- Palmetto Construction Group, LLC v. Restoration Specialists, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2024