Legal Opinion
Bogue v. Ampex Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 26, 1990No. C-89-0682 CALPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT
LEGGE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Donald Bogue brings this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq., claiming that defendants wrongfully denied him severance benefits, breached their fiduciary duties, and interfered with his protected rights. Defendants have moved for summary judgment on all claims alleged against them in the first amended complaint. Having considered the record, the relevant authorities, the moving and opposing papers, and the arguments of counsel, the court concludes that there is…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- De Nobel v. Vitro Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Daniel Kunin v. Benefit Trust Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Leroy Ellenburg, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee. v. Brockway, Inc. & Spellman Cunningham, Defendants-Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Donald F. Bogue v. Ampex Corporation and Allied-Signal, Inc. Does 1-10, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Clark v. Bank of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Jordan v. Retirement Committee of Rensselaer Polytechnic InstituteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Smith v. Hartford Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Donnelly v. Bank of New York Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.