Legal Opinion
Clark v. Bank of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 25, 1992No. 90 Civ. 4072 (MBM)PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MUKASEY, District Judge.
In this action for employee benefits, the parties have taken profligate advantage of the availability of pre-trial motions. Defendant The Bank of New York (hereinafter “defendant” or “the Bank”) has moved for summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 56(i) as to Count One on the ground that no material issue of fact remains in dispute, and (ii) as to Counts Two, Three, and Four on the ground that those state-law claims are preempted by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Defendant also has moved…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- National Union Fire Insurance v. L.E. Myers Co. GroupDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Algie v. RCA Global Communications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Mason Tenders District Council Pension Fund v. MesseraDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Dawes v. First Unum Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Paramount Communications, Inc. v. DonaghyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.