James v. James
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Bichardson, J., entered July 9, 1903, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action for partition.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, C. J.
This is an action for partition of real property. In his complaint the respondent, who w.as plaintiff below, alleges that he is the owner in fee of an undivided seven-tenths interest in the east half of the southwest quarter, and lots 3 and 4, of section 30, in township 24 north, of range 44 east, of the Willamette Meridian; that Bertha James, Mabel E. James, and Walter W. James, are the owners in fee of the remaining three-tenths interest) and that it is to the best interest of all of said owners that the property be partitioned between them. He then alleges that the appellant, Le Boy James,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tyler v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
- Shearer v. WeaverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
- Garneau v. Port Blakely Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1894
- Gill v. SullivanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
- McCollister v. YardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1938
- Sipes v. Puget Sound Electric Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
- State v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
- State v. KniffenWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Gilbert Co. v. HustedWashington Supreme Court · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.