Legal Opinion

McCollister v. Yard

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 22, 1894PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from ■ Johnson District Court. — Hon. S. H. Fairall, Judge. Action for' the recovery of certain real estate, together with the rents and profits thereof. Estella McFadden intervened. From a decree in favor of the intervener, and against the plaintiff, the plaintiff and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtKinne, J.

This is an action in equity, brought by Mary E. McCollister, wherein she claims to be the owner of a large amount of real property, also certain *623rents and profits arising therefrom, all of which the defendant "Welch, as administrator, holds in his possession. During the pendency of the plaintiff’s action, Estella McFadden (by her guardian) intervened therein, claiming said property. The cases were tried as one, and were heard before Hon. James D. Griffen, judge of the eighteenth district, as a referee, who found for the defendants in the ease of McCollister v. Yard et al., and for the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sewall v. RobertsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  2. Tyler v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  3. Shearer v. WeaverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  4. Abney v. DeLoachSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  5. Long v. HewittSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Chehak v. BattlesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  2. Horner v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  3. Barney v. HutchinsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Henry v. TaylorSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Appeal of RitchieNebraska Supreme Court · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API