Gilbert Co. v. Husted
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Black, J., entered November 30, 1907, upon findings in favor of the defendant, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action of replevin.
1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, J.
On the 3d day of July, 1903, the Allen & Gilbert-Ramaker-Co. entered into a conditional sale agreement with the defendant Husted for the sale of a piano. The purchase price of $325 was made payable as follows: $25 on the execution of the contract of sale, and $15 on the 3d day of each and every month thereafter until the purchase price with interest at the rate of 8 per cent per annum, was fully paid. Title was to remain in the seller until the full payment of the purchase price. At the same time, and as a part of the same transaction, the parties to the conditional sale agreement entered…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gray v. BlanchardSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Horrell v. California, Oregon & Washington Homebuilders' Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Ames Iron Works v. ReaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892
- Roberts v. Shelton Southwestern RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1899
- Gorman v. HavirdSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Yellowstone Sheep Co. v. EllisWyoming Supreme Court · 1939
- Titan Truck Co. v. RichardsonWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Standard Furniture House v. BurrowsWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- National Cash Register Co. v. WapplesWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Kohler & Chase, Inc. v. TurnerWashington Supreme Court · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.