Legal Opinion

State v. Kniffen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1906No. 6325PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Klickitat county, McCredie, J., entered January 18, 1906, upon a trial and conviction of the crime of bigamy.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, C. J.

The appellant was convicted of the crime of bigamy. He alleges on this appeal that the court erred in permitting Nellie Kniffen, the alleged first wife of the appellant, to testify as a witness on the part of the state over his objection. The question is, whether the first wife, under the statute, is a competent witness against the accused *486on trial for the crime of bigamy. The statute reads as follows:

“The following persons shall not be examined as witnesses: (1) A husband shall not be examined for or against his wife without the consent of the wife, nor a wife for or against her husband…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bassett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Hills v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  3. State v. SloanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  4. Hoch v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  5. People v. QuanstromMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Wright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
  4. State v. KephartWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. State v. MoxleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API