Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Cicero

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 2012No. 2012-0278PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.

{¶ 1} Respondent, Christopher T. Cicero of Columbus, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0039882, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1988. On *312June 13, 2011, relator, disciplinary counsel, filed a complaint with the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline. The complaint charged Cicero with professional misconduct based on his communicating information that he had received from a prospective client to a third party. Relator alleged that Cicero’s conduct violated Prof.Cond.R. 1.18 (prohibiting a lawyer from using or revealing information learned during discussions with a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. StatzerOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. WiseOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. CiceroOhio Supreme Court · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. RuarkOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. CiceroOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. WardOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. Dougherty and Cicero (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. Shimko (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API