Legal Opinion

Hasselman v. Carroll

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1885No. 12,081PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

On the 17th day of April, 1883, L. W. Hasselman & Co., of Indianapolis, appointed the appellees agents in the town of Arcadia and vicinity, to sell the Eagle Straw Stacker, of which they were the manufacturers. The appointment was by an instrument in writing, which, besides a great many other stipulations, contained the following:

*154“Fifth. To deliver no stackers to any party until settled for as herein provided, agreeing, as a penalty for any violation of this article, to become personally responsible for the ■same, waiving all claim under warranty on said machinery ¡and insuring settlement for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Boardman v. GriffinIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Thomas v. DaleIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railway Co. v. BurgerIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Buchanan v. MilliganIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Puterbaugh v. PuterbaughIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Armacost v. LindleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API