Walker v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.
The plaintiff recovered a- judgment in the court below, and the trial court granted defendant’s motion for a new trial, and the plaintiff appeals.
It is well settled that, when the trial court grants a motion for a new trial, the same inferences and presumptions in favor of his action in doing so are indulged as would be in case he refused a motion for new trial, and this is so whether he assigns the proper reason for doing so or not.
It is settled law by the decisions of a majority of the states as well as the United States Supreme Court that, when the master is sued jointly with his servant…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. CarrollSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Supreme Lodge of the World, Loyal O. of M. v. GustinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
3Cited by26 opinions
- Louisville N. R. Co. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Smith v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
- Barnes v. AshworthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
- F. W. Woolworth Co. v. EricksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Southeastern Greyhound Lines v. CallahanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.