Legal Opinion

Walker v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 8, 1926No. 6 Div. 412PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.

The plaintiff recovered a- judgment in the court below, and the trial court granted defendant’s motion for a new trial, and the plaintiff appeals.

It is well settled that, when the trial court grants a motion for a new trial, the same inferences and presumptions in favor of his action in doing so are indulged as would be in case he refused a motion for new trial, and this is so whether he assigns the proper reason for doing so or not.

It is settled law by the decisions of a majority of the states as well as the United States Supreme Court that, when the master is sued jointly with his servant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. CarrollSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. Supreme Lodge of the World, Loyal O. of M. v. GustinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Louisville N. R. Co. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  2. Smith v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  3. Barnes v. AshworthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
  4. F. W. Woolworth Co. v. EricksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. Southeastern Greyhound Lines v. CallahanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API